New poll, multiple selections possible!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you play 3.0 or 2.0? (part 2)
Collapse
X
-
Do you play 3.0 or 2.0? (part 2)
493.0 Remastered, browser16.33%83.0 Remastered, Steam6.12%32.0 Flash, browser51.02%252.0 Steam6.12%3HTML5, browser0.00%02.0 Android or iOS20.41%10The poll is expired.
Last edited by Leander; 14 January 2019, 07:32 PM.Tags: None
-
I try to play 3.0, browser if possible to get used to it, but it doesn't load sometimes or if it does the waiting times are horrible on some of my devices, so I swich back to 2.0, browser in this situations.S&F's Tavern - https://discord.gg/XWfSwe3
-
I have started this poll paralel in the german forum https://forum.sfgame.de/showthread.php?t=79258
There are more players who play 3.0 or at least play both depending how good they run.S&F's Tavern - https://discord.gg/XWfSwe3
Comment
-
For me too, on fast pc's 3.0 is ok after you have become comfortable with it, but I don't know why they have changed the view so much and don't created it near the old version.
What you have to understand is that 3.0 is not a new version that will run paralel to 2.0 forever. The underlying reason for 3.0 is that Adobe has announced the death of flash player for 2020 quite some time ago and therefore the 2.0 flash version of shakes and fidget has no future and it's not in the responsibility of Playa Games to hold it alive.
As bad as that it is by 2020 2.0 will nolonger work.S&F's Tavern - https://discord.gg/XWfSwe3
Comment
-
There are way more people that still play 2.0
So, it's safe to assume that "the biggest update in 3 years" is trash.
It's bugged af, slow af and since beta release it's not getting better.
The most part of the playerbase is not just unhappy with the 3.0, they are not playing it at all.
If the "base" for further updates is junk, how can we expect those updates will not be junk as well?
Please playa, do something. (maybe don't release 328659825618 new servers, focus on the gameplay)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Acclamator View PostI have started this poll paralel in the german forum https://forum.sfgame.de/showthread.php?t=79258
There are more players who play 3.0 or at least play both depending how good they run.#1 International Hall of Fame Attained
1st Complete Arena Manager in the World
1st Complete Underworld in the World
1st Complete Fortress in the World
1st Complete (New) Scrapbook in the World
1st to find all Pets in the World
1st Deep Mine Master in the World
1st to Gem Mine Level 100 in the World
1st to Gold Pit Level 100 in the World
Any staff or sponsored players with access to free/unlimited mushrooms are null and void for any achievements
Comment
-
Remember, German people tend to follow rules/guidelines more so now the new "rule" is 3.0S&F's Tavern - https://discord.gg/XWfSwe3
Comment
-
Sure, they can switch and move stuff around, make things more intuitive.
However the biggest downside - system requirements is probably unchangeable.
From my guild maybe 10% uses 3.0. More then half is Very unhappy with remastered. At least 15% will have a hard time playing the game if 2.0 stops working.
A lot of people use older laptops or play other stuff while logging to SF.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Arturu View PostFlash version works faster and better.
Remastered version has faster hero luring in Underworld but significantly worse pets menu.
The time I lose luring heroes I would waste waiting for the game to load, so as it stands flash seems way bettter.
Another game I play regularly has recently switched from Flash without changing anything else, and that gave them time to focus on resolving any problems, so it works beautifully now. I don't know why this couldn't have been done separately from the whole "remastering" exercise.
Please at least fix the access to the pets menu, it's just ridiculous the way it is.
Comment
Comment