Shakes & Fidget - The Game - Supportboard

Shakes & Fidget - The Game - Supportboard (http://forum-int.sfgame.net/index.php)
-   General (http://forum-int.sfgame.net/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Do you play 3.0 or 2.0? (part 2) (http://forum-int.sfgame.net/showthread.php?t=7784)

Leander 14th January 2019 07:30 PM

Do you play 3.0 or 2.0? (part 2)
 
New poll, multiple selections possible!

Acclamator 15th January 2019 08:31 AM

I try to play 3.0, browser if possible to get used to it, but it doesn't load sometimes or if it does the waiting times are horrible on some of my devices, so I swich back to 2.0, browser in this situations.

K0rkki 16th January 2019 08:32 AM

Waiting for the android release. Based on the critique of the browser version I'm expecting an unwelcome increase in battery consumption.

Damascus 16th January 2019 12:37 PM

Definitely 2.0! It's faster and better.

Nabuchodonosor 16th January 2019 06:48 PM

2.0 flash, really faster, you cna play multiple server at once and it's more effective to play with.

i don't care of new graphism..not so much better tbh.

Acclamator 21st January 2019 07:16 AM

I have started this poll paralel in the german forum https://forum.sfgame.de/showthread.php?t=79258

There are more players who play 3.0 or at least play both depending how good they run.

Arturu 21st January 2019 07:43 AM

Flash version works faster and better.

Remastered version has faster hero luring in Underworld but significantly worse pets menu.


The time I lose luring heroes I would waste waiting for the game to load, so as it stands flash seems way bettter.

Acclamator 21st January 2019 09:46 AM

For me too, on fast pc's 3.0 is ok after you have become comfortable with it, but I don't know why they have changed the view so much and don't created it near the old version.

What you have to understand is that 3.0 is not a new version that will run paralel to 2.0 forever. The underlying reason for 3.0 is that Adobe has announced the death of flash player for 2020 quite some time ago and therefore the 2.0 flash version of shakes and fidget has no future and it's not in the responsibility of Playa Games to hold it alive.

As bad as that it is by 2020 2.0 will nolonger work.

Gully 21st January 2019 12:53 PM

There are way more people that still play 2.0

So, it's safe to assume that "the biggest update in 3 years" is trash.

It's bugged af, slow af and since beta release it's not getting better.


The most part of the playerbase is not just unhappy with the 3.0, they are not playing it at all.

If the "base" for further updates is junk, how can we expect those updates will not be junk as well?

Please playa, do something. (maybe don't release 328659825618 new servers, focus on the gameplay)

Strider 21st January 2019 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acclamator (Post 55329)
I have started this poll paralel in the german forum https://forum.sfgame.de/showthread.php?t=79258

There are more players who play 3.0 or at least play both depending how good they run.

Remember, German people tend to follow rules/guidelines more so now the new "rule" is 3.0

Leander 21st January 2019 08:14 PM

Thanks for voting!

Acclamator 22nd January 2019 08:24 AM

Quote:

Remember, German people tend to follow rules/guidelines more so now the new "rule" is 3.0
I think the german community is more aware that 3.0 is not an option for the future but will soon enough replace 2.0 completely. So they focus on getting warm with it and help to adjust it to the needs of the players (definitly still lots of work to do!).

Arturu 22nd January 2019 09:21 AM

Sure, they can switch and move stuff around, make things more intuitive.

However the biggest downside - system requirements is probably unchangeable.

From my guild maybe 10% uses 3.0. More then half is Very unhappy with remastered. At least 15% will have a hard time playing the game if 2.0 stops working.

A lot of people use older laptops or play other stuff while logging to SF.

Magelie 22nd January 2019 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arturu (Post 55331)
Flash version works faster and better.

Remastered version has faster hero luring in Underworld but significantly worse pets menu.


The time I lose luring heroes I would waste waiting for the game to load, so as it stands flash seems way bettter.

I agree with all of the above. Plus, I really hate the look of my avatar on 3.0! The mini-picture in particular is horrible. I've been playing this game for several years now and I'm really quite attached to my character and her expression!

Another game I play regularly has recently switched from Flash without changing anything else, and that gave them time to focus on resolving any problems, so it works beautifully now. I don't know why this couldn't have been done separately from the whole "remastering" exercise.

Please at least fix the access to the pets menu, it's just ridiculous the way it is.

Bqczek 22nd January 2019 05:32 PM

My eyes still hurt and I've seen 3.0 just once. Why not keep the old look. Avatar, Hud, font. Equipment looks better.. well partially, most arts has this nasty glow.

Mardera 6th June 2019 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bqczek (Post 55347)
My eyes still hurt and I've seen 3.0 just once. Why not keep the old look. Avatar, Hud, font. Equipment looks better.. well partially, most arts has this nasty glow.

+1oo5oo

3.0 is awful

rvm1975 11th June 2019 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arturu (Post 55345)
A lot of people use older laptops or play other stuff while logging to SF.

advice to use steam version ... 10x more faster comparing to browser


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright by 'Playa Games GmbH'